EBP Integra — Enterprise Technology, Digital Trust & Strategic Protection
Service / Human Risk Management

Human Risk Analytics & Reporting

Convert training, simulation, exposure, policy and engagement evidence into actionable human-risk intelligence for security leadership.

Business context

What this capability solves

Human-risk programmes generate many metrics but often lack a coherent risk model. Analytics should identify where risk concentrates, which interventions work and whether culture is changing over time.

EBP Integra delivery principle

Technology is implemented as an operating capability: architecture, integration, governance, assurance, people, procedures and measurable outcomes are designed together.

Deep-dive capabilities

Capability model

Modular building blocks allow the scope to start with a focused pilot and expand into an enterprise operating model.

Risk Score

Combine governed indicators into explainable individual/group risk bands.

Trend Analytics

Track improvement by department, role, geography, risk cohort and campaign.

Intervention Effectiveness

Compare learning/coaching/simulation outcomes to identify what reduces risk.

Compliance View

Track required training, policy acknowledgment and programme evidence.

Executive View

Summarize exposure, behavior trend, high-risk cohorts and remediation progress.

Drill-Down

Allow authorized security teams to investigate relevant behavior or exposure signals with privacy controls.

Reference architecture

How the capability fits together

Final topology, control placement and deployment model are validated during discovery and detailed design.

People & Identity
Employee/contractor population, role, department, risk context, identity and organizational hierarchy.
Behavioral Risk Engine
Assessment, phishing outcomes, learning behavior, policy status, exposure signals and risk scoring.
Engagement & Intervention
AI-personalized coaching, microlearning, phishing simulations, campaigns, policy actions and workshops.
Management & Evidence
Dashboards, risk trends, compliance evidence, integrations, escalations and continuous improvement backlog.

Controls & governance

  • Data minimization and role-based access
  • Transparent purpose and acceptable monitoring boundaries
  • No punitive use of risk scores without governance
  • False-positive and contextual review for behavioral indicators
  • Controlled phishing rules and safe landing pages
  • Policy/e-sign evidence integrity
  • Retention limits for learning and simulation records
  • Escalation for exposed credentials or high-risk patterns
  • Management reporting focused on risk reduction, not surveillance

Priority use cases

  • CISO human-risk dashboard
  • Board cyber-culture reporting
  • Department risk comparison
  • Compliance evidence
  • Campaign optimization
  • High-risk user management

Key deliverables

  • Risk model
  • Executive dashboard
  • Operational dashboard
  • Monthly/quarterly report
  • Cohort analysis
  • Intervention effectiveness report

Integration considerations

  • HRIS / employee directory
  • Google Workspace / Microsoft 365
  • SSO / identity provider
  • E-mail and approved chat channels
  • SIEM/SOC or security operations
  • GRC/policy repository
  • Ticketing/workflow platform
  • API/MCP integration layer
Implementation

Phased delivery

Each phase ends with evidence, acceptance criteria and a decision gate before broader scale-out.

1. BaselineImport population, assess maturity, establish human-risk baseline and segment priority groups.
2. PersonalizeConfigure learning, phishing, policy and intervention pathways based on role and risk.
3. EngageRun chat-native coaching, simulations, campaigns and culture activities in normal work channels.
4. MeasureTrack risk score, learning, simulation outcomes, policy completion and exposure signals.
5. ImproveTarget repeat-risk populations, refine content and controls, and report progress to management.

Outcome and KPI framework

Risk score trendHigh-risk cohort reductionRepeat behaviorReporting behaviorProgramme completionIntervention effectiveness