Human Risk Analytics & Reporting
Convert training, simulation, exposure, policy and engagement evidence into actionable human-risk intelligence for security leadership.
What this capability solves
Human-risk programmes generate many metrics but often lack a coherent risk model. Analytics should identify where risk concentrates, which interventions work and whether culture is changing over time.
Technology is implemented as an operating capability: architecture, integration, governance, assurance, people, procedures and measurable outcomes are designed together.
Capability model
Modular building blocks allow the scope to start with a focused pilot and expand into an enterprise operating model.
Risk Score
Combine governed indicators into explainable individual/group risk bands.
Trend Analytics
Track improvement by department, role, geography, risk cohort and campaign.
Intervention Effectiveness
Compare learning/coaching/simulation outcomes to identify what reduces risk.
Compliance View
Track required training, policy acknowledgment and programme evidence.
Executive View
Summarize exposure, behavior trend, high-risk cohorts and remediation progress.
Drill-Down
Allow authorized security teams to investigate relevant behavior or exposure signals with privacy controls.
How the capability fits together
Final topology, control placement and deployment model are validated during discovery and detailed design.
Controls & governance
- Data minimization and role-based access
- Transparent purpose and acceptable monitoring boundaries
- No punitive use of risk scores without governance
- False-positive and contextual review for behavioral indicators
- Controlled phishing rules and safe landing pages
- Policy/e-sign evidence integrity
- Retention limits for learning and simulation records
- Escalation for exposed credentials or high-risk patterns
- Management reporting focused on risk reduction, not surveillance
Priority use cases
- CISO human-risk dashboard
- Board cyber-culture reporting
- Department risk comparison
- Compliance evidence
- Campaign optimization
- High-risk user management
Key deliverables
- Risk model
- Executive dashboard
- Operational dashboard
- Monthly/quarterly report
- Cohort analysis
- Intervention effectiveness report
Integration considerations
- HRIS / employee directory
- Google Workspace / Microsoft 365
- SSO / identity provider
- E-mail and approved chat channels
- SIEM/SOC or security operations
- GRC/policy repository
- Ticketing/workflow platform
- API/MCP integration layer
Phased delivery
Each phase ends with evidence, acceptance criteria and a decision gate before broader scale-out.
